Intense fear+anxiety of something often harmless, but disrupts daily life.
Phobias are learnt from CC; if neutral [not scary] stimulus is paired with a scary stimulus, the neutral stimulus also scares the person- this is called expectancy learning.
A kind of CC; a neutral stimulus being paired with something that causes inexplicable disgust.
Positive reinforcement used to reward behaviours [mother praised the boy for handling buttons]
Manuals are used to see if symptoms are strong enough to require treatment, including duration & severity. S&S used the DSM-5 including 300 disorders & 22 categories.
Emotion that helps us avoid harmful situations; S&S used evaluative learning to show how we link NS to harmful things.
S&S’s study is important because no other researcher had tried to reduce disgust to reduce fear.
Case study; deep analysis of 1 rare case. Qlt & Qnt data collected using a structured interview, observation & psychometric scale of subjective distress. Longitudinal study- studied before, during & after the treatment.
Approach & avoidance observed & recorded during therapy. Approach classified as: touching, holding & manipulating. Feelings thermometer used to score distress: 9 pt scale from 0-8.
9 y/o Hispanic-American from Florida; selected because his mother brought him to the Child Anxiety & Phobia Program at Florida International University in Miami. He had the phobia for 5 years & no other diagnosis.
Boy & mom interviewed [semi-structured] using the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM Child & Parent version [ADIS-C/P]. Done to confirm the phobia. Also asked about stressful life events which may trigger phobias, & checked for other disorders.
DISGUST/FEAR HIERARCHY | |
BUTTON TYPE | DISTRESS |
Large denim jean | 2 |
Small denim jean | 3 |
Clip-on denim jean | 3 |
Large coloured plastic | 4 |
Small clear plastic | 4 |
Hugging mom w large plastic button | 5 |
Medium plastic coloured | 5 |
Medium clear plastic | 6 |
Hugging mom w med. plastic button | 7 |
Small coloured plastic | 8 |
Small clear plastic | 8 |
DISGUST RELATED IMAGERY EXPOSURE
7 sessions; the boy described hpw buttons look, feel & smell & how he felt imagining them. Also imagined diff sizes & cognitive restructuring took place. Post treatment follow up ADIS-C/P used right after treatment, 6 months after treatment & 12 months after treatment.
In nursery, a bowl of buttons fell on him in front of the class so the phobia got worse.
Unable to touch/handle buttonsà cannot dress himself, school work suffered because couldn’t concentrate, he was afraid to touch anything that touched buttons & so avoided clothes & people with buttons.
POSITIVE OUTCOMES
He could tolerate more buttons with each exposure & faced all 11 buttons
NEGATIVE OUTCOMES
Distress rating increased significantly between sessions 2&3 & 3&4. He was more distressed by medium coloured button & hugging mom with large plastic bottles than he was at the creation of the hierarchy; expected because of evaluate learning & disgust-based phobias.
NEXT 7 SESSIONS
It was hard to describe what exactly was unpleasant about the buttons, but they were gross & disgusting. After imagery exposure, ratings of distress decreased.
POST-TREATMENT FOLLOW-UP.
At each follow up, the ADIS-C/P showed that he didn’t have the phobia anymore, reported no distress & wore clear plastic buttons.
Evaluative learning is useful understand disgust’s role in childhood specific phobias, exposure therapy --> fear-based phobias, imagery exposure -->disgust-based phobias. These are increasingly effective in targeting emotions linked to stimuli.
Informed consent gained from the boy & his mother for: initial diagnosis, treatment, publishing & a write-up. Maintained confidentiality & prevented psychological harm. The detailed explanation of the bowl of buttons & his ethnicity may make him recognisable.
ADIS-C/P is reliable; children were tested 7 & 14 days after treatment & showed a positive correlation of 0.84.
Hard to replicate; therapy is spontaneous & depends on the patient’s needs.
Strength: longitudinal design; the boy didn’t have symptoms during the follow up, so the imagery exposure therapy worked. Most therapists don't follow up, so the efficacy is hard to be establish.
Strength: Case study; provided rich, detailed data. ADIS-C/P used to confirm the diagnosis, & he was observed to see his reactions to buttons. The feelings thermometer [self-report] used to see the change in disgust. The use of triangulation increased validity.
The boy learned not to fear buttons using operant & CC, showing that we learn from these processes.
Weakness: The mother may have over reacted about the severity of the symptoms & the boy could have down played them to make the therapist happy, so they cannot be sure about the efficacy of therapy.
Weakness: Only one Hispanic-American boy was used. Treated at a prestigious university by 2 experts; this may not work for children/therapists of diff backgrounds, so not generalisable.
S&S took this case because there is less information on evaluative learning, disgust & childhood phobias. Used the ADIS-C/P & feelings thermometer to increase validity.
CC based therapy phobias lead to long term improvements of exposure therapy.
SIMILARITIES | DIFFERENCES |
S&S+ Bandura: Qnt data | S&S: case study, Bandura: IMD. |
S&S + Fagen: Trying to change behaviour | S&S: human boy, Fagen: female elephants. |
STRENGTHS | WEAKNESSES |
High validity | Self-report |
Follow up data | Hard to generalise & replicate |
Triangulation | |
High reliability |